Calorie counting for fat loss is a myth

The Calorie Conundrum: Debunking the Weight Loss Equation

Welcome to the diet dilemma! Ever been told the secret to weight loss is as simple as “calories in minus calories out”? It’s a neat little equation that makes sense on the surface, but it’s like saying the secret to great art is “paint on canvas.” It’s true, but it’s only part of the story.

A Tale of Two Calories

Picture this: you’re at a crossroads with two dishes before you—one, a 500-calorie fast-food burger, and the other, a 500-calorie wholesome salad brimming with fresh veggies, lean protein, and a drizzle of olive oil. Both have the exact calorie count, but does your body treat them the same way? Not quite.

Unmasking the Calorie Count

Calorie counting can be a bit like playing darts in the dark. You might get the general direction right, but hitting the bullseye? That’s a whole other game. Despite their confident proclamations, food labels often play a guessing game with calorie counts. Plus, they reveal nothing about the food’s quality or how many calories your body absorbs.

The Processed Food Predicament

Processed foods bring a whole new twist to the calorie tale. They’re like the sirens of the food world—highly palatable, easy to overeat, and with a knack for messing with your body’s finely tuned systems. They can disrupt your hormone balance, toy with your gut lining, and even skew your satiety signals, leaving you hunting for snacks even when you’ve technically had enough calories.

Macronutrients and Caloric Availability

To add another layer of complexity, caloric availability can vary based on the type of macronutrient you’re dealing with—picture Calories as a busy city. Fat would be the city center—easily accessible and densely packed, providing the most calories. Carbohydrates are in the suburbs, while protein is in the rural outskirts—requiring more energy to extract calories.

More than a Numbers Game

The “calories in minus calories out” equation may have kick-started the weight loss conversation, but it’s far from the whole dialogue. It doesn’t consider the complex symphony of digestion, absorption, and metabolism our bodies conduct every time we eat. Not all calories are created equal, and the body’s response to different types of food can significantly impact our overall health and weight.

Beyond the Calorie Count

So, what’s the takeaway here? It’s simple: strive to see beyond the calorie count. Instead, tune into the quality of the food you’re eating. Embrace whole, nutrient-dense foods and be wary of highly processed fare. Listen to your body’s cues, understanding that hunger isn’t merely a sign you need more calories but perhaps better ones.

Ultimately, weight loss isn’t just a math problem to be solved—it’s about nurturing a healthier relationship with food, understanding your body’s unique needs, and making sustainable changes that support lifelong health and well-being.

So, the next time someone tells you that weight loss is as simple as “calories in minus calories out,” remember there’s more to the story—a story that starts on your plate and unfolds in the complex and fascinating world within your body. Here’s to embracing the whole picture and redefining our understanding of calories for healthier, happier lives.

*****

See Original Source

*****
Summary of Transcript:
The common weight loss belief of “calories in minus calories out” being a perfect science is not entirely accurate. Calorie counting is imprecise and tells us nothing about the quality of the food or how many calories our body absorbs. Processed foods can significantly impact calories, and labeling can be inaccurate and misleading. Highly processed foods are palatable and easy to overeat, which can disrupt our hormone system, gut lining, and satiety signals. Caloric availability varies by macronutrients and how processed the food is, with fat having the highest caloric availability and protein the lowest. Calories are not a precise science due to the variation in macronutrient profiles and labeling inaccuracies.

*****
Summary of Description:
The content discusses the limitations of counting calories for fat loss, including the impact of processed foods, fiber, gut microbiome, macronutrients, and caloric availability. The author provides evidence-based tools for sustainable fat loss without counting calories and recommends further reading and resources. Additionally, the content includes affiliate links for products the author personally uses and recommends.

*****

Source Description
Hello! Despite what many people in the fitness industry are telling you, you CAN lose fat without counting calories, and calorie deficits are a lot more complex than they seem. Today I talk about the imprecision of counting calories, all the different factors that can impact the amount of energy you absorb and use, processed foods, fiber, the gut microbiome, macronutrients, and caloric availability, and provide some evidence-based tools for fat loss without counting calories.

I’m losing fat without counting calories in my 90-day cut challenge. Check out my challenge playlist if you’re interested in science-based, sustainable fat loss:

Other videos to check out on the subject:
How to Lose Fat with Science-Based Tools | Huberman Lab Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17O5mgXZ9ZU
Dr. Robert Lustig, Is a calorie? Standford Health Care lecture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxyxcTZccsE
Diary of a CEO Podcast with Giles Yeo: https://youtu.be/Gy_vcL1cpP8

Sources:
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/processed-foods/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26962035/
https://www.cell.com/cell-metabolism/fulltext/S1550-4131(19)30248-7
https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/79/5/899S/4690223#109825920
https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/94/1/58/4597976#110828432
https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry-guide-developing-and-using-data-bases-nutrition-labeling
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193131281830266X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0882401019315517
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/5/1155

Related readings:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/public-health-nutrition/article/ultraprocessed-foods-what-they-are-and-how-to-identify-them/E6D744D714B1FF09D5BCA3E74D53A185
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8619086/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193131281830266X

Here’s my Naked Harvest invite link if you’d like to receive $20 off your order (I will receive rewards points if you use this coupon):
https://i.refs.cc/xt5irvwQ

If you’re making your first order from Oner Active, follow my link to receive $10 off your first purchase (I will receive rewards points if you use this coupon): https://i.refs.cc/Mv6MH03M?smile_ref=eyJzbWlsZV9zb3VyY2UiOiJzbWlsZV91aSIsInNtaWxlX21lZGl1bSI6IiIsInNtaWxlX2NhbXBhaWduIjoicmVmZXJyYWxfcHJvZ3JhbSIsInNtaWxlX2N1c3RvbWVyX2lkIjoxNDkwNDA3MjY2fQ%3D%3D

Below are Amazon affiliate links for things I use and love. I make a small commission at no cost to you if you choose to shop those links. If you take that extra step to support me, THANK YOU! 🙂
FITNESS
My ankle straps: https://amzn.to/3cKOPdX
My wrist straps: https://amzn.to/3AMDAtt
My booty bands aren’t sold, but this set is almost identical: https://amzn.to/3Qeefyn.
My favorite clear protein powder: https://amzn.to/3RilCGu
My creatine: https://amzn.to/3RfIVkd
LIFESTYLE
My shampoo: https://amzn.to/3TD9bqa
My conditioner: https://amzn.to/3Qh8BLI
My self-tanning drops: https://amzn.to/3jmLd5q
My camera, Sony ZV-E10: https://amzn.to/40sPLYj
Ember mug that keeps coffee/tea hot: https://amzn.to/3JuMeCQ
BOOK CLUB
Atomic Habits, how I finally built habits that stick: https://amzn.to/3HUHZzb

Chapters
0:00 Intro
1:23 What is a calorie?
1:46 Processed foods
4:50 Caloric availability
5:52 Nutrition label inaccuracy
7:07 Fiber
7:43 Time-consuming & mental health
8:50 Lose fat w/o counting calories